Posted by & filed under Indian abroad, Media.

At around 9:30 AM IST on Saturday, Rajdeep Sardesai (Editor-in-chief IBN 18 network) said this on his Twitter account –

Rajdeep has 1.3 Million Twitter followers. NaMo refers to Narendra Modi who is the current odds-on favorite to be the Prime Minister of India. He has over 3.3 Million followers on Twitter.

15 hours later, Rajdeep tweeted this –

Later in the day he said this –

Rajdeep is no spring chicken. He is a seasoned media veteran in a divided nation. He is very familiar with both the passions surrounding Narendra Modi and the way dogs are perceived by a lot of the country. Four out of every thousand Indians own dogs and 99.6% of the population likely thinks of stray, diseased and unclean street dogs when they hear about dogs. While Nemo maybe Rajdeep’s cuddly pet and is probably the cutest dog on earth, Rajdeep should surely have known that his tweet would incite strong feelings. If he intended to troll Namo’s massive internet fan-base or expose the vilest insults the internet throws at him, his tweet was excellently thought out. After all it was just wordplay.


But apparently this is not what he intended. He intended no malice and was then apparently taken aback by the response from anonymous Twitter accounts who cannot be held accountable by any law or service provider. I don’t buy for one second that Rajdeep couldn’t see this coming from a mile away. If he really is as naive about this as he portrays himself to be, he is the dumbest editor-in-chief in the world. I for one, think he is way smarter than that.

Twitter’s most unique feature is in how easily it connects celebrities and regular people. Prior to and post-Twitter there has been no service that allows for easy 2-way communication between the rich and famous and those that are not. This leveling of interaction coupled with the anonymity and privacy that Twitter provides makes it the perfect breeding ground for overreactions, emotions and vile tweets. Basically any user anywhere can create an anonymous profile, say anything at anyone and not be held accountable for saying whatever. Right now I could tweet at you that your mother is a whore who slept with you and I could continue tweeting for the rest of my life. Rajdeep or any media personality should know this by now and pretty much anything he says is bound to invoke a lot of reaction including the vilest the internet has to offer because of how Twitter works.

So for Rajdeep to apologize many hours later and then play victim is ludicrous. It would be the equivalent of me yelling “Fire” in a movie theater when there was no fire and then pointing out how people were mean to me for ruining their experience. Only, there are laws and social norms in most countries that would result in a slap of my wrists if I did what I described here. Twitter for now is mostly lawless and Rajdeep should have known that reactions to his “harmless” tweet from over a million people would span the spectrum of human behavior and decency.


For a decade, Indians could not even decide if they were #teamdravid or #teamsachin. Being on one of these ridiculous metaphorical teams almost always brought out insults from the other. So is it any surprise that Twitter and Indians reacted to Rajdeep the way they did? It is par for course and one that should be assumed and expected if you are a media person of any sorts.

So as troll-y as Rajdeep’s original tweet was, his reaction was even worse. To point fingers at those tweeting at him and to play victim is much worse than his original tweet itself. Twitter is not right and it is not fair. But it is the way it is and the Editor-in-chief of a major news corporation should certainly know better than to not expect a gamut of reactions every time he tweets. Especially when he has a million followers!

Update: Here was Rajdeep’s response to my post. Thanks Rajdeep Sardesai for reading my tweet, my post and responding. It is appreciated.

Posted by & filed under cricket.

International cricket is going thru one of its biggest challenges right now with the menage-a-trois of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the England and Wales cricket board (ECB) and Cricket Australia (CA) on the verge of screwing over (for good) the other cricket-playing nations. With the attention of journalists and fans on backroom dealings and cricket administrators, curious events in the recently concluded Pakistan vs. Sri Lanka test in Sharjah escaped many a skeptical set of eyes.

Image courtesy the Creative Commons license and ESPNCRICINFO

Strange events that transpired on day five of the test tell me that the question on whether the game was fixed or not is a legitimate one and one that should be asked. While I have no smoking gun, I strongly suspect this test was fixed.

Here are the reasons why –

1) Human incentive to lose voluntarily is high when the loss doesn’t cost much. In this case, the Sri Lankan team knew they would not lose the series. In this case the Sri Lankan team knew they were getting a new coach anyways with Graham Ford returning to Surrey. With respectability already sealed and the series unloseable, who is to say a loss and some cash were not the best outcomes for Sri Lanka’s players? This is after all a cricket team playing for a constantly cash-strapped cricket board (1,2).

2) This is the pitch map of Pakistan’s second innings on the final day at Sharjah. If Sri Lanka were serious about winning, wouldn’t they have bowled more than 20% of the deliveries with the negative line and length associated with pitching the ball on or around the leg stump and at a fullish length? I did not see every ball of this game live but watching the highlights and looking thru the raw data on Cricinfo, it does not seem like Sri Lanka tried particularly hard on day 5 to contain Pakistan.

3) The series had seen scoring rates between 2.4 and 3.1 runs per over. Pakistan had not averaged more than 3.1 runs per over in any of their innings prior. The pitches especially the one at Sharjah were slow. Suddenly faced with a must-win situation, Pakistan accelerated to T-20 rates to score over 300 runs in just over 50 overs. Azhar Ali (career strike rate of 39) and Misbah Ul Haq (career strike rate of 42) suddenly turned in to Virender Sehwag circa 2005 to play chanceless knocks that won their team a test. You can choose to believe in the spirit of humanity under adversity or you can choose to be skeptical of protagonists from troubled cricket boards and nations and I choose the latter.

4) The exceptional Andy Zaltsman who normally sees the forest for the trees like a wide-eyed visionary lumberjack outlined a bunch of curious statistics from the test in his article on Cricinfo. He points out how using Cricinfo’s behemoth statistical tools, he has encountered only one other test match where the # of dot balls was fewer than the # of singles conceded. And all of this was against the second slowest scoring team of the last four years. Zaltsman adds,”To concede 160 singles in 57.3 overs was a frankly superhuman effort, a landmark in anti-pressurisation of batsmen. There is much talk of “bowling dry”, to restrict the batsmen’s flow of runs. Sri Lanka bowled damp. They avoided being drenched by a deluge, but instead ended up slowly saturated, sogging themselves into submission with a steady seepage of singles, their tactics as effective as an umbrella made of bread.”


If you were working on Ocean’s Eleven type of plot to fix and intentionally lose a cricket match, wouldn’t your recipe be – Wait for a Monday in December when the series cannot be lost, allow plenty of singles, tell everyone you had the right idea to win and then lose with a whimper and have the game be forgotten.

If I had any connections to players or officials involved or if I had any power to sniff around, I would dig deep into this test match. There are plenty of unique and idiosyncratic occurrences that can just as easily be attributed to malice and intention-to-fix as they can be to the human spirit and luck.

I think the Sharjah test between Pakistan and Sri Lanka was fixed. Someone should look into it.

Posted by & filed under cricket.


American sports media was all into the baseball hall of fame this week. The Baseball Writers of America (BBWA) voted three players into the hall of fame Wednesday. A sport that lends itself seamlessly to numbers and stats raises quite the ire and passion from fans on which individuals gain a 75% approval rating from an arbitrary group of baseball writers. Even the phrase “baseball writer” is an arbitrary and archaic definition in this day and age. Beat writers on newspapers with circulation in the low thousands have votes to the hall of fame for they are “baseball writers” while Nate Silver and Jay Jaffe don’t.

While there is a lot to be desired on the subjectiveness of the process of voting individuals into the hall, the fact that baseball has a hall of fame is for lack of a better word, cool. It is cool for baseball fans to learn about and have ideas on who the best players of different eras were. It gives fans a vision into timeframes they weren’t a part of. It makes for excellent debate and conversation. It truly connects the sport’s history, tradition to the fan.


The past week made me think of a sport I am a much bigger fan of. Cricket needs its own hall of fame. It needs to be housed in a city which will treat the physical structure as a shrine. It needs to capture the greatness of those in it, thru videos, pictures and classic audio clips. It needs to be able to narrate the story of various eras of the great sport clearly communicating the conditions, the teams’ strengths during that period and the performance of the doyens of the time. While limited overs cricket is already 40 years old, the hall of fame I envision is primarily and largely for test cricket. Test cricket simply has been a much larger buffet of performances and players for a much larger period in time. It needs to be devoid of political machinations and hence hopefully unaffiliated to a cricket board or the ICC.

Assuming this utopian hall of fame materializes, what would be the broad criteria under which cricketers are admitted or voted in? Who lets them in? I underscored baseball’s subjectiveness earlier but there are some parameters under which those debates operate. In some sense, outfielders who hit fewer than 500 home runs or pitchers who didn’t pitch at a certain high level (Earned run average <=3 ?) for at least ten years are not usually voted in. What would such criteria for cricket look like? Here are my thoughts on some very basic first-level filtering criteria, accounting for the over 130 years of history the sport has. 1) For the test match hall of fame, batsmen should check off at least two of the three boxes - Over 120 innings, average at least in the forties and played at the highest level for at least eight years. To me, these account for longevity, skill and consistency. For bowlers, a strike rate of at least 50, eight years at the highest level and at least 250 wickets should be the three corresponding boxes. 2) The voting should be divided and weighed between fans of the sport, statisticians and cricketers. Anyone voted into the hall of fame should be given an automatic vote on who else gets in. A 2/3rds majority threshold should be needed once votes are weighted and counted. laraobama

3) Every cricketer not in the hall of fame should be eligible every year. This way, performances and perception of performances are allowed to change over time accounting for changes in the world around them. An Alec Stewart candidacy for the hall of fame doesn’t look so bad now, does it? Did it look as good in 2003?

4) There should not be an artificial cap of players that can get in to the hall of fame in a year. Merits need to be fleshed out comprehensively and not via a cap on the number of entrants.

It is possible that a cricket hall of fame becomes another horse trading tool. It is possible that criteria are even more hazy than baseball. It is possible that a cricket hall of fame is the worst idea since matches between the ICC and Australia were deemed official. But in every case and in every way, a concept that recognizes and charts the history of cricket, the stalwarts of the game and provides both a constant fodder for debate and a shrine to those who worship the gentleman’s game is a good idea by me.

Let’s make it happen! What else would you like in a cricket hall of fame?

Posted by & filed under NFL.

Image courtesy Google image search and the Creative Commons License

For the third year in a row, my friend (who was unfortunately born into the pre-existing condition of 49ers fandom) Mark and I are exchanging emails as the NFL playoffs kickoff. In 2011 it was in anticipation of a 49ers at Packers match-up that never transpired. In 2012 it was ahead of a game I knew the Packers would lose. In 2013…….

Dear happy and soon-to-be-sad Shyam,

On Sunday night, you sent the following text:

“Thought game would be a pick ’em. Instead it is sf – 2.5. Vegas loves ur team. Not a good sign for me.”

First, let me say, didn’t I call this two weeks ago? Niners coming to Lambeau for a playoff game. Couldn’t ask for a better way to close out the season than the same way it started. Better yet, time for us to talk some smack! Perfection.

Second, take a moment to enjoy from where the Packers came. Given up for dead with Rodgers gimpy collarbone. Coming back, only to be given up for dead again. And Rodgers finally comes back in week 17 to lead an improbable victory and division title? That’s like the most gut-wrenching-est fairy tale season ever. But you’re in like (Matt) Flynn, and that’s all that matters when we get to the playoffs. Time to play some craps.

Third, you have to look at past history to understand the betting line. Although that 8-7-1 division title gives you a home game in the first round of the playoffs, you’ve got the 12-4 49ers coming for a visit and recent results haven’t been too favorable for the greenies. I’ll put it like this: Kap owns you pretty hard, with his legs… or his arm. Sure, you looked great against the likes of the no-D 8-8 Bears and the other dregs in your division ( Lions ), but how do you think the Packers will fare against a real defense? We already know the Packers’ D is hardly a fence.

(Aside: When is the NFL going to start rewarding strong “wild card” teams with a home game over a weak division winner?)


That said, there are concerns in ninertown. The defense hasn’t been as stout the last few weeks; it seems to be turning into the porous version from last year’s playoffs. Sadly, Kap isn’t superhuman (Editor’s comment: Mark may or may not have sent the pasted photo here as an image file and said it reveals otherwise), and their offense is still a huge question mark. (Exhibit A: first quarter in Arizona versus rest of game.) And the Lambeau advantage shouldn’t be underestimated. I recall thinking the Saints would pound the Seahawks a couple playoffs ago, back in the NFC Worst days, only to see them lose in Seattle. It’s back to that crapshoot where anything can happen, so I wouldn’t advise the Niners to take the Packers for granted, despite recent history. I like the Niners’ chances, of course, but this is no way a gimmie. No playoff game is a gimmie.

The 49ers *should* win this game… and the right to play in Seattle the following week, at which point I will secretly hope the Niners win while proclaiming they have no chance.


Watch this and then this and then this ….. I have watched live sports for 30 years and I have not felt a moment quite like that one. It’s taken me over 24 hours to gather myself and draft a coherent response. Seriously. If you had movie producers pitch you a tale where the star quarterback comes back from a nine week layoff and throws a game winning touchdown on 4th and eight in his arch-rival’s home turf to a teammate who was playing his first game in 12 weeks, you would ask them to come back with something remotely believable. So forgive me for my state of disbelief and euphoria after a Sunday like no other and in a season like no other.

So I am enjoying this moment and I am extremely bullish going forward. I think the 49ers are the better team and you know how I worship at the altar of Jim Harbaugh quite religiously and shamelessly. I can see why Vegas has your guys as 3 point favorites. Yet unlike the last three times when I had a sinking feeling going into the game, I am very bullish right now. Here are the reasons why –

A) This is the first time in the Jim Harbaugh era that the 49ers are playing the Packers with just a week between games. On all three prior occasions he had multiple weeks to get his team prepared. Jim Harbaugh with more than a week to prepare will get the better of most teams most of the time but with only a week I like the Packers’ chances to be closer to 50-50.

B) This game is at Lambeau in the frigid weather. I think it is cavalier to assume that the 49ers are a “physical” team and will adapt. I don’t know the last time players on this 49ers roster would have played in conditions like the ones they will encounter at Lambeau. Injury stats show the 49ers to be one of the healthiest organizations in the sport and I am sure Harbaugh will have the roster well prepped but if things get tight in the fourth quarter on Sunday, I don’t think the 49ers can quite keep up with the elements as well as the Packers can.

C) This is the second road game in a row for the 49ers and third game in 13 days. I am a huge believer in the impact of travel and lack of rest in the NFL. Finishing up in Arizona one Sunday at 4:30 PDT and to get ready for a game in the snow seven days later is hard. I think it plays a role.

D) The Packers passing game when it is on, is really hard-to-stop. A healthy Rodgers throwing to Jordy, Randall, James, Boykin and Quarless is going to be very hard to match up to however well your defensive line is playing. On familiar home turf in front of a deeply adoring, loud and clamoring crowd, the Packers passing game will stretch the coaching staff and secondary of the 49ers. The Niners defense is playing much worse than it did last year according to Football Outsiders. They were the second best defense in the league last year but are 13’Th best now.

Six days and six nights prior to the game, with the boner from Sunday’s game versus the Bears still very present and for the reasons listed above, I love my team’s chances. Jim Harbaugh will win more often versus the Packers than he will lose. He is the best coach in professional sports and if I had to pick one individual to run my team for the next three decades it would be him. But even the greatest lose football games and on any given Sunday anything can happen. Like this.

Go Pack, Go

P.S: I love that we both are confident our teams will win :). When did that last happen?

Posted by & filed under NFL.


Matt, Eddie, Tramon and Sam were making plays. Ridiculous, insane and you-have-no-business-being-human plays. Midway through the frenetic fourth quarter on Sunday, right after one such play, I was pacing up and down the living room like a man awaiting his cancer screening results. I was sweaty, pale and paying no attention to anything other than the game on the TV screen. The wife would have none of it and tried to bring some perspective to the situation. “You’re not going to make the playoffs…Aaron’s not coming back this year, is he? It’s just a game…”, she said in a voice that clearly indicated she didn’t “get it”.

“It’s not just a game. It’s not just about the playoffs. It is about rooting for what is good versus what is evil!!!”, I hollered back hyperbolically during the next commercial break. I gave her the 30-second version of the Jerry Jones story and how it felt wrong for a team that did it the “right way” to lose to one that didn’t. I am not sure she remembers any of it now. I even remember her laughing.

Tramon Williams

By winning a game they had no business winning followed by the Detroit Lions losing a heartbreaker at the hands of the Ravens, the Packers are now 2 wins away from a spot in the most open NFL playoffs in a long time. By winning a game they had no business winning, the Packers injected relief, life and joy into a fan-base that had been drained of cheer and luck for nearly two years. By winning a game they had no business winning, the Packers reminded me again why I love sports and have loved sports for all of my life. By winning a game they had no business winning especially when led by a quarterback who neither the Raiders nor the Bills wanted, the Packers showed me that miracles do happen.

There are absolutely no guarantees in sports and in a season where they have lost their starting quarterback and an incredulously high number of key contributors to injury, the Packers are one play and one Sunday away from elimination into the vast NFL wasteland. But after a game that defied history, momentum and logic, the team just made December and possibly January very interesting. If you don’t think the 14-2 Seahawks are not suddenly waking up to a cold wet dream that Aaron Rodgers, Mike Mccarthy and M D Jennings may be making a visit to the Clink in a month, you don’t know much about sports.

Twenty minutes after I had gotten off my good vs. evil soapbox, Eddie Lacy would steamroll six Cowboys on his way to a touchdown that gave the Packers a 37-36 lead (first lead of the game) followed by a Tramon interception that sealed the deal. “What a badass. What a badass team.”, the wife said in a voice that clearly indicated she got it.

This is the team that made her “get it”.


Go Pack, Go

Posted by & filed under cricket, Indian abroad.

ipl teams

Cricinfo’s Nagraj Gollapudi provides us some insight into what the select cavalcade of rich Indian businessmen are thinking up and thinking of ahead of the next edition of cricket’s most lucrative league and tournament. Based on this article and other tidbits that have been revealed about IPL 7 so far, here are seven questions I hope the league and ownership groups are thinking about so as to ensure a competitive and exciting season of T-20 cricket.

1: Where is IPL 7 going to be held?

Short answer: Nobody knows.

Long answer: I don’t really understand why games held in established cricket grounds in metropolitan cities for three hours a day are so gravely affected by the prospect of general elections around the same time. Cricket matches happen in conjunction with extreme weather, local festivals and in the immediate aftermath of war and conflict. It is unclear to me why the very rich owners of IPL teams don’t partner with the local governments of the cities they represent and ensure game day logistics and travel arrangements are well set for eight evenings in the year.

The truth though is that the powerful and rich owners themselves seem resigned to moving IPL 7 outside of India if it coincides (like it mostly will) with the 2014 general elections. If so, I hope the tourney is moved to cities and grounds which will provide good crowds and semblances of bias towards certain teams and players. I hope Sri Lankan and Bangladesh cities are not chosen by default. Ideally, even an abridged tournament with games at the 8 cities that make up the IPL will be a better watch for viewers and a better product for fans everywhere than a tournament that is moved out of India. I hope the owners think long and hard about this.

2: When will the venues for IPL 7 be decided?

Short answer: Nobody knows.

Long Answer: Teams are about to invest Rs 600 million into resources hoping to win IPL 7. I for one hope that they are able to put their rosters together after the venue for the season is decided. For example, the Royal Challengers Bangalore surely care if games are going to be held in their home ground that has proven to be the most batsman-friendly of all the venues before choosing to invest in either AB De Villiers or even Chris Gayle. If their home games for season 7 were moved to Dambulla or Headingley, do they really pay Rs 125 million for Gayle?

The BCCI is notorious for making things up on the fly and I hope the owners insist on closing on the venue ahead of the auction.

IPL 7 2

3: Are the proposed new retention rules better than the rules set prior to IPL 4?

Short Answer: Depends.

Long Answer: If your definition of better is with respect to the ease of retaining essential members of the current squads, then the answer is YES. With up to eight spots open for retention and with five of those eight spots having cost certainty, retaining players is far easier than it was going in to IPL 4. If your favorite team declines to retain a player, they truly really don’t want him. Because the way the proposed system is setup, a team has enough flexibility if they really want someone.

However if your definition of better is with respect to parity, the answer is NO. If the teams with greater revenue and clout (Mumbai, Chennai) can now retain more of the players from their very successful rosters of the past three years, it means there is lesser talent available for the underdog franchises. So while owners of the Kings XI Punjab, Sunrisers Hyderabad and Rajasthan Royals might think the new rules give them the ability to retain and carry over solid chemistry, they are reducing their chances to poach the big guns. I will get to other reasons this proposed retention system kills parity, with a deeper dive while answering questions 4 and 5.

4: What are the loopholes in the rule that proposes that up to five players can be retained?

Short answer: Kills flexibility in roster building.

Long answer: The proposed rules have blanket hard-coded salaries for the five players a team can retain from its IPL 6 roster. For the first player that a team retains, the team is likely to lose Rs 125 million from the Rs 600 million salary cap for IPL 7. This is also the amount paid to the first retained player. Similarly the cost of retaining players 2-5 is likely to be baked in to the system, according to the Cricinfo article referenced earlier.

I can see the merits in this approach but I am not sure owners have thought this through well. This approach absolutely kills flexibility and any ‘Moneyball’ approach that an intrepid team might want to pursue. A team that may want to build off 3-5 middle class players (for lack of a better term) is unable to do so and has to devote 25% of its salary cap to one member who would be the franchise player. This falls right in the wheelhouse of the established superpowers and makes it harder for a Kolkata, Punjab or Rajasthan to break through using a different approach. The biggest gainers from this setup will likely be David Miller and Gautam Gambhir who may end up being franchise players worth way more than they would be in the open market.

My recommendation to owners would be to give franchises the option to retain 5 players at five different salary levels and blank unfilled intermediate slots. For example, the Sunrisers today if they chose to retain Shikhar Dhawan and Thisara Perera would pay Rs 125 million for Dhawan and Rs 95 million for Thisara. However they should be allowed to retain Shikhar Dhawan at Rs 125 million but Thisara Perera at the fourth retention slot of Rs 50 million rather at the more expensive second retention slot. They should be allowed to keep the second and third slots blank if they value players differently. Some protection for the players’ incomes can be inserted with the ‘right-to-match’ rule extended to all players. The rule is talked about in detail in the Cricinfo piece referred to above.


5: What are the loopholes in the ‘right to match’ rule?

Short answer: Depends.

Long answer: The proposed rule indicates that teams can raise a ‘right to match’ card for up to three players during the IPL 7 auction. It is unclear to me at what point in the auction the team raises these cards. Do they wait for the seven other teams to bid up the player before revealing their card or do they announce ahead of time to the council or auctioneer, who the players they choose to use these cards on are? Also, why leave this at 3 players? Why not extend this approach to every player playing in the league so as to make it the truest free market of them all?

This rule has a lot of promise if designed and implemented correctly. I wait eagerly on what the owners conjure up.

6: What new steps have been taken to prevent betting, match-fixing and corruption?

Short answer: Nothing.

Long answer: Nothing. The article and IPL announcements have been hazy about specifics that are being put in place to prevent a repeat of the embarrassing and disturbing scandals of years past. Here’s hoping there are steps that make a difference, soon.

7: Why is there no penalty to a team if it chooses to let go of players between IPL 7 and IPL 8 or between IPL 8 and IPL 9?

Short answer: Because the owners are smart and don’t want to be held accountable for mistakes.

Long answer: While wholesale auctions only take place every three years, teams can carte blanche their way out of bad decisions or player injuries by dropping a player and recouping all of the money owed to him as part of the available salary cap for the ensuing season. Smart owners who want to gain an edge should propose some sort of penalty (for e.g. only 50% of salary relief that is gained by the release of a player should be available for the team to use in the ensuing auction) rather than the status quo that does not reward those teams that do a good job of identifying sustainable talent over three years.

What other questions do you think need to be answered now about IPL 7?

Posted by & filed under NFL.


There is no silver lining for the Packers in the aftermath of Aaron Rodgers’ fractured collarbone on Monday Night Football. This injury reduces their chances of winning the NFC North, winning a playoff spot ahead of the Bears/Lions and Panthers, and of winning 10+ games (for a fifth successive season). Eleven wins are likely needed to clinch the sixth spot in the NFC and the Packers’ margin for error is exceedingly low. Hate to say it but this is probably a lost season for the Green Bay Packers. The NFC is just too deep and has too many good teams for the Packers to overcome the loss of their beyond-excellent QB Aaron Rodgers.


There is however one man whose future with the franchise can be decided based on the events of the next few weeks. That man is fifth year defensive coordinator Dom Capers. The next three opponents on the Packers’ schedule are the Eagles, Giants and Vikings. Two of these games are at home. These teams are a combined 7-18 on the season. The stat guys I trust at Football Outsiders have the Eagles as the sixth best offense thru the season but have the Vikings and the Giants as the 23’rd and 28’th best offenses in the league. The Eagles have exhibited a high degree of variance in their offensive performances and I think it is noteworthy that their numbers are skewed a bit by exceptional performances versus Oakland, Tampa Bay and New York , teams that have a combined W-L record of 5-19.

I trust that Ted Thompson has put together a deep roster and allocated resources in the best manner possible for the Packers. I believe Mike Mccarthy and Tom Clements will use the cavalcade of wide receivers, running backs and tight ends the Packers do have to generate enough yards of offense to keep the Packers in each game. Between them, these men in charge will do enough to give the Packers shots at wins over the next three weeks. What I am not sure of though is what Dom Capers will do. Dom Capers was outcoached by Marc Trestman last Monday night and could not keep the Bears offense off the field in the fourth quarter. Just like he couldn’t against the 49ers the last two times the teams played each other. Just like he couldn’t versus the Patriots in 2010 and the Lions in 2011 when Rodgers did not start for the Packers.

Dom Capers is highly respected among NFL media and front offices. He is also someone the Packer fanbase is very skeptical of. If he can coax and coach the talent Ted Thompson and team have put together for him to three stout defensive performances allowing the Packers to move to 8-3 on Thanksgiving eve, last Monday night’s montage will be the opening act of NFL FILMS’ America’s game on the 2013 Green Bay Packers. If he fails to keep mediocre offenses down to 17 points or less and ends up overburdening an offense that lost its shining star, he will be and should be replaced as the defensive coordinator of the 2014 Packers.

This is Dom Capers’ biggest test yet. Hope he succeeds.

Go Pack, Go

Posted by & filed under Indian abroad, NFL.


Watching several hours of NFL football for over a decade finally bore fruit as the roomful of heroes at NFL.COM’s Around the League blog and podcast invited me to participate in their monthly trivia contest titled ‘Win Chris Wesseling’s toaster’.

I have been a huge fan of Gregg Rosenthal and Chris Wesseling and it was indeed a great thrill to speak with them and participate in NFL trivia versus Chris. The whole experience was fun, thrilling and one that made my Wednesday. Please listen to minutes 49-61 of the podcast to find out how I did. Also tell me how much you scored?

The whole episode is here and the episode is titled ‘Week 8 TNF Preview, Greg Cosell’.
You can also search for Around the League on your podcast app.

My eight minutes of internet fame were a lot of fun. Hope you get a laugh as well.

Posted by & filed under cricket, Media.

Image courtesy the Telegraph and the Creative Commons license

Last week my twitter timeline was abuzz with excitement over Afghanistan’s qualification into the 2015 cricket world cup. Renowned simpleton Harsha Bhogle led the cheerleading charge and had this to say:

What I don’t understand yet is why anyone other than a native of Afghanistan should be happy about this? While the rise of a country from sporting irrelevance to world cup level competence is charming, doesn’t the country’s meteoric rise speak more about the lack of quality and talent on other Associate member nations than it does about anything the <a href=””>Afghanistan cricket board</a> did? FYI The cricket board’s website does not even load on most browsers.

On the geopolitical front, Afghanistan is one of the world’s most dangerous, corrupt and undemocratic nations. It is also a poor nation with a violent tortured history with a population whose core identity is far more tribal than national. It is also a poor country that will depend entirely on its neighboring superpowers to help with any level of financial support.

It is exactly the sort of country that cricket does not need right now. Is there any way an international team outside of Pakistan or Bangladesh would dare tour Afghanistan in the next decade? Is there any country outside of Pakistan and Bangladesh who would dare play Afghanistan at a neutral venue? Is there any way Afghanistan cricket can have any leverage over the undemocratic events at the ICC when their source of any revenue and growth lays in the hands of its bigger, more established and powerful neighbors? The faster Afghanistan cricket gets better, the better it is for the Board for control of cricket in India (BCCI) as there is now one more cricket board which will vote and do things as the BCCI wishes.

Ireland, Scotland, The United States, Netherlands, Hong Kong and Canada are all associate members too. If any or all of them had the kind of success Afghanistan have had, cricket will move towards a better place. It would behoove the game to grow in vibrant democracies unencumbered by political turmoil thus opening up new and free fan-bases and marketplaces to a game badly in need of those. If the BCCI’s unilateral clout is going to have to be taken on, the path involves finding England and Australia newer large allies and populations; not a tiny undemocratic state that will use the sport as distraction from its various misdeeds and flaws.

Kudos to the cricketers, administrators and fans of Afghanistan who have helped create the most shocking David vs. Goliath story west of Oakland, California. Kudos to the belief that underdogs can win. Kudos to those who possess or identify flair and skill among the ugliness and violence. But please no cheers for the fans of the sport of cricket. There is very little good and a lot of bad that comes with Afghanistan’s entry into the cricket mainstage.


Image courtesy the Telegraph and the Creative Commons license

Posted by & filed under Media.

Image courtesy James han from and Creative Commons License

Image courtesy James han from and Creative Commons License

I have always been skeptical of Facebook-the company and its corporate dictatorship, Facebook-the product and the people behind Facebook. To date I do not have a personal account on Facebook and will never have one.

I wish I had held firm with these beliefs on a December night last year when under the weight of that Oh so powerful peer pressure, I caved and created a Facebook page for this blog of mine. I was told it was a must-have for any writer who aims to grow his readership. I was told that a lack of such a page reveals a lack of professionalism and seriousness. Convinced that I had found a new source for traffic and ad revenue I shamelessly LEANED IN and created a Facebook page, bugged my readers for Likes and publicized individual posts. Oh how wrong I was in having done this.

On September 4 2013, I received the following email from Facebook support:

Read more »