Posted by & filed under Indian abroad.

Twitter introduced me to this post by Hawkeye view. The post interspersed with Tamil catchphrases is a ridicule of those Indians in America who are on a work or student visa and root for President Obama. It characterizes them as silly and stupid and as rooting against their own interests by rooting for Obama over Romney. The best interests that the writer refers to are the paths to a green card and permanent residency for Indian immigrants and the hypothesis is that these paths are shorter and more realistic under a prospective Romney administration than a second Obama term.

As one of the Indians in America who cannot vote but annoys everyone with pro-Obama links and quotes everyday, I am going to take up the task of trying to rebut hawkeyeview’s hypothesis with a 5 point rebuttal plan. Looking forward to feedback from others who have experiences and takes on this issue.

1. North American energy independence , just kidding.

2. The president is but a small piece of the immigration puzzle – Passing immigration reform to staple green cards to engineering graduates is not something that can be done in the form of an executive order. It is something that requires support from the House and the Senate. The H.R. 3012 bill that is referred to in @hawkeyeview’s post is actually one that was held up in the (senate for over six months) from even being put to vote by a Republican senator Chuck Grassley. Similarly Republican senator Lamar Smith introduced similar reform in the House in a way that the desired outcome can not be achieved. While Governor Romney’s intentions may be to pass a bill that gives out green cards to science and engineering graduates, Congressional process and polarization over the last four years has shown that the difference between intention and action is very large. I think the case for electing Governor Romney solely on this issue will be stronger if his role in spearheading targeted legislation thru a divided or polarized Congress can be described. To portray Governor Romney as omnipotent and as a panacea for the issue is as flawed as portraying President Obama as the same. Congressional action is needed for this and Indians are better served getting the attention of Republican senators and Democratic members of Congress.

3. Rhetoric is different from record – One of the basic rules of election season is that rhetoric doesn’t always match the record. Any one who has followed Governor Romney thru the last four years will agree that he has said different things at different times to different audiences. This is what politicians do. And who’s to blame them? To convince a vast and diverse array of people why you are the best at a job when everyone has different interests and goals is an incredibly difficult task.

It is with this context that I view words from politicians. Is there anything in the recent Republican record that shows a path to permanent residency for H1B and EAD card holders as a priority? The party he belongs to is one of the least diverse and most opposed to any forms of immigration in recent history. In 2007, then president George W. Bush could not get his party to vote on a bill that solved the immigration issue for a generation.

The Republican party has jumped on any immigrant-friendly statements or measures that President Obama has made. Even in the Google+ hangout that the president participated in earlier this year, Republicans joined a chorus in criticizing the president on allegations that the president was not concerned about the growth of H1B engineers. While their rhetoric around elections is friendly towards green card seekers and tech firms, they have consistently shown that they will jump to the nativist side of the room at the first opportunity.

4. Voting for someone solely on one issue is hard – Even assuming Governor Romney and the Republican party would prioritize and expedite Indian Green card applications, it is really hard for intelligent human beings to vote solely on one issue. Even when the issue is as fundamental as their career and life flexibilities, it is hard to reconcile the position of a political party on that issue with their platforms against science, unemployment benefits, help for the poor and needy, healthcare for all and equality for gays and lesbians. If we were voting in the Indian elections would we vote for Narendra Modi over Rahul Gandhi on one issue? Would we be okay with a party that raises the reservation quota for a certain caste at public universities by 25% while also opposing foreign direct investment? Would we not weigh the pros and cons and make an informed choice? Why then should we root for one candidate here on one issue alone?

5. My personal experience – I came to the U.S in 2001. I was here in 2004 when President Bush and the Republican party took specific offense to John Kerry calling outsourcers ‘Benedict Arnolds’. Then president Bush’s message was that he would not demonize technology firms that outsourced or immigrants who got degrees in science and technology. My employer filed for my permanent residency status in the summer of 2007. I was told by plenty of immigration lawyers and immigration message boards that the election of a democratic president would be the worst thing that could happen to me and that I should start saving up money to move back to India whether rI wanted that or not. I noticed my EAD (Employment Authorization) priority date stuck for over three years in the long and non deterministic immigration pipeline. I experienced the same frustrations that several Indians do of not being able to make career or life plans because of the uncertainty surrounding the green card process. Suddenly in the spring of 2011, there was enormous movement and traction on this issue thanks to a huge push from President Obama’s jobs council which included several leaders from the technology world. I have also noticed that since then there has been little to no traction on this front for several of my friends and coworkers as parties have gotten neck-deep in the campaign rigmarole.

My summary is that the green card issue like most things is complex and nuanced. No one leader can change it overnight and the factors that govern it are too disparate and too vast to be narrowed to a singular rooting interest. Hopefully this explains why at this moment more American desis root for Obama and that they’re not stupid to do so.

3 Responses to “Five reasons American desis support Obama”

  1. catchharish

    Seriously. I really hoped you had something other than green cards and outsourcing as reasons for desis to vote for Obama… This is akin to westerners talking about India through the lens of caste, cows and dowry.. I expected something more detailed, serious and nuanced.. this is a disappointment !!! :)…. I was itching for a debate here..:).even though i support for Obama in this election race

    Reply
  2. shyamuw

    @harish You are right that this is not to the nuance and detail either of us like but I do say in the piece,” Even when the issue is as fundamental as their career and life flexibilities, it is hard to reconcile the position of a political party on that issue with their platforms against science, unemployment benefits, help for the poor and needy, healthcare for all and equality for gays and lesbians. If we were voting in the Indian elections would we vote for Narendra Modi over Rahul Gandhi on one issue?”

    Why do you still say I am basing my points on one issue?

    My point is that desis voting for Romney because Republicans have a media built reputation as pro business and pro legal immigration is hogwash. There can be other reasons but not that. And I also tried to say how hard it is for an immigrant class that is fairly well off and well educated to reconcile with an anti science and anti empathy aprty.

    Thoughts?

    Reply
  3. shyamuw

    @harish Pasted below is my convo with Rajeev Srinivasan on the same topic. Slightly hard to read thx to Twitter.

    @RajeevSrinivasa love your work and perspective but you are mistaking today’s republicans for a different idealistic group.
    Expand
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw worst racists of recent past were dems: eg george wallace, southern dems; robert byrd. bush was good to latinos
    Expand
    27 Oct Shyam Sundararaman Shyam Sundararaman ‏@shyamuw

    @RajeevSrinivasa bush may have had good intentions for Latinos but his base and party stomped on any bill including ’07 bill.
    Expand
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw i used to think like you, appalled by william f buckley, wsj, etc but as i aged, i realized they were not as hypocritical as dems
    Expand
    27 Oct Shyam Sundararaman Shyam Sundararaman ‏@shyamuw

    @RajeevSrinivasa you don’t think affordable care act was a good piece of legislation ?
    Expand
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw looming worst health problem is a diabetes epidemic, created by farm bills encouraging excess corn production: midwest farm lobby
    Hide conversation

    Reply
    Retweet
    Favorite

    10:05 AM – 27 Oct 12 · Details
    Tweet text
    Image will appear as a link
    View more in conversation →
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw not sure. indians, brainwashed by left-lib ideas at home, tend to think demos naturally sympathetic to them. not really
    View conversation
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw obamacare? band-aid. real problem is escalating health-care costs, poor RoI. no point treating the symptom.
    View conversation
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw i used to think like you, appalled by william f buckley, wsj, etc but as i aged, i realized they were not as hypocritical as dems
    View conversation
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw neither party are angels, but under obama, visas for foreign tech grads so hard they’re going to AUS, CAN, SGP, even chile
    View conversation
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw worst racists of recent past were dems: eg george wallace, southern dems; robert byrd. bush was good to latinos
    View conversation
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw i doubt if you can say cause/effect about prez and green cards. there is a big process. i have no idea who was prez when i got PR
    View conversation
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw public sector unions a menace esp in CA; other cartel/unions: doctors’ AMA, engineers’ IEEE. also H1B slashed to 65k under obambi
    View conversation
    26 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw your green card woes are due to Dems, who want protectionism for unions. Repubs want to keep out ‘wetbacks’, not educated people
    View conversation
    26 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    my firstpost piece on why romney will be slightly better for india/indian-americans than obummer: http://bit.ly/ULSRCK http://post.ly/9f85I
    View summary
    26 Oct Shyam Sundararaman Shyam Sundararaman ‏@shyamuw

    @RajeevSrinivasa good post. my thoughts on why indians in america vote for Obama – http://no-sacred-cows.com/2012/10/17/5-reasons-american-desis-support-obama/
    Expand
    26 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw i experienced 5 Presidencies. Demos more protectionist. Repubs more racist. so take your pick. both bad, a matter of degree.
    Hide conversation

    Reply
    Retweeted
    Favorite

    1 Retweet
    Shyam Sundararaman

    10:39 PM – 26 Oct 12 · Details
    Tweet text
    Image will appear as a link
    26 Oct Shyam Sundararaman Shyam Sundararaman ‏@shyamuw

    @RajeevSrinivasa repubs just seem so disingenuous and slimy.
    Expand
    26 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw your green card woes are due to Dems, who want protectionism for unions. Repubs want to keep out ‘wetbacks’, not educated people
    Expand
    27 Oct Shyam Sundararaman Shyam Sundararaman ‏@shyamuw

    @RajeevSrinivasa I know that’s how it was 20 years ago.What unions are left now?largest movement in Desi priority dates happened under Obama
    Expand
    27 Oct rajeev srinivasan rajeev srinivasan ‏@RajeevSrinivasa

    @shyamuw public sector unions a menace esp in CA; other cartel/unions: doctors’ AMA, engineers’ IEEE. also H1B slashed to 65k under obambi
    Expand
    27 Oct Shyam Sundararaman Shyam Sundararaman ‏@shyamuw

    @RajeevSrinivasa did repubs under bush do anything for legal immigrants other than lip service ?
    Expand

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)